Alexis Maimonis

Alexandra Eve Maimonis, known professionally as Alexis Maimonis, is the founding partner of Maimonis Law LLC, a Chicago-based Illinois defense firm serving insurance carriers, employers, TPAs, self-insured organizations, municipalities, public entities, and claims professionals.Her work begins with the client’s desired outcome. Maimonis collaborates with the claims team to define the decision the matter must support, assess exposure, and develop a matter-specific litigation blueprint. Investigation, medical and documentary proof, fact and expert depositions, witness preparation, motion practice, settlement strategy, hearing preparation, trial, and preservation for review are then aligned around that objective.Her experience spans the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, Illinois circuit courts, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, appellate matters, the EEOC, and related administrative proceedings. It includes workers’ compensation defense, federal civil-rights and employment litigation, municipal and public-entity defense, insurance and general-liability matters, homeowners’ association litigation, subrogation, Section 5(b) recovery, and complex medical and expert-witness issues.Representative work includes building the arbitration record later used to reverse an award and deny a high-exposure City of Chicago claim; obtaining a $114,141.20 benefit credit that remained intact through appellate review; and preparing Commission briefing across four Section 19(h) petitions involving five evidence depositions, competing medical opinions, vocational evidence, and permanent-total-disability exposure.Maimonis Law is structured for direct founder involvement. The attorney evaluating exposure is the attorney developing strategy, communicating with the client, preparing key witnesses, and handling contested proceedings. Clients receive candid analysis, disciplined record development, clear reporting, and a defensible next decision.The firm’s public materials document representative litigation and written advocacy rather than relying on generic claims of experience. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.